The result was delete. I completely discounted both WP:VAGUEWAVEs (one keep, one delete) and the WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments relating to her predecessor don't hold much weight either. I find the BLP1E argument to be the most compelling, as well as the only one based in policy, as opposed to guidelines. However, I would suggest that the subject may be worthy of coverage in other articles. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Renominating for notability concerns as previous AFD was cut short (deleted as WP:CSD#G5 and then restored). Note that searches for "Elizabeth Hagen" turn up a number of other Elizabeth Hagens, so casual assertions of "lots of hits" aren't helpful. Note that the current article has zero information about the BLP subject besides her appointment. Rd232 talk 16:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC) reply