From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Elizabeth Wong (politician). Lankiveil ( speak to me) 12:12, 30 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Eli Wong (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an interesting because it has hardly changed since starting in February 2009 and the best search results I found here, here and here and additional searches at Malaysian news The Star, The Sun, New Straits Times, Malay Mail, Malaysian Reserve and until Borneo Post I found a few links here. Pinging possibly interested user Download. Basically the current version suggests she was best known for the photos controversy so if she is notable this will need be changed and improved. SwisterTwister talk 17:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • She served in a legislative assembly at the state level, so she's technically an automatic keep under WP:NPOL #1 — but there's an unexpected twist here: there's actually another article about her, at Elizabeth Wong (politician), which explains her notability better than this and is much more properly formatted (although it still needs sourcing improvement). So this should probably be redirected to the other article (this one was technically created a day earlier, making that one the nominal duplicate, but that one's the much better article) — although I also wouldn't be opposed to deletion as a duplicate article if "Eli" isn't actually a name that she would be expected to be known by. Bearcat ( talk) 17:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC) reply
Comment. The sources in the article in question refer to her as "Elizabeth Wong", but I found one recent news article referring to her as "Eli Wong" in the article's title. [1] I'm OK with redirect or merge/redirect. - Location ( talk) 21:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Merge The articles should obviously be merged and that includes the history. Andrew D. ( talk) 18:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - Clear fork of another, much better, short article. Not seeing much to merge here. Carrite ( talk) 15:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.