The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment First of all, you're right, it's horribly titled. But I think it's just a minor symptom of a problem with how the whole subject is organized, or rather, not organized. As with so many complex topics, different articles have been created and updated at different times by different people, and the choice of what to put where ends up looking kind of random. Just based on a quick glance through the various links from
transexuality and
transgender, information ends up all over the place. On the specific topic of surgery, there's a non-specific article on sexual reassignment surgery, and separate articles for M-to-F and F-to-M, concentrating on genital surgery. For M-to-F, there's another article on facial feminization, then this one, which is basically "other" (breasts, trachea, voice). Deleting this article won't help with the overall need to organize the topic.
Fan196715:38, 17 March 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.