The result was keep. NW ( Talk) 02:19, 20 September 2010 (UTC) reply
This article reads like an essay; in fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it was copied and pasted directly from somewhere else. Smells like plagiarism/copyvio to me (not to mention the BLP issues; the article seems to portray the subject in a rather negative light without providing inline citations for the more potentially-inflammatory statements). Stonemason89 ( talk) 02:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC) reply
I nominated this article for rescue because, while this article is about a notable person (There are over 20 references, and about half are books), the information in the article isn't sufficient. This article needs to be edited to include more information from the references listed. This might establish notability better. Matthewrbowker ( talk) 00:13, 20 September 2010 (UTC) reply