The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Five more unremarkable moons of Jupiter, failing
WP:NASTRO and
WP:GNG. They were officially named in August 2019 after a Twitter-based
IAU voting contest,[1] and the articles contain concerning amounts of personal information about those who voted for the winning names. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄)
06:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep: Despite having completely unknown physical characteristics, these moons have plenty of media coverage about their discovery history and naming. Plenty of interest in these moons still persists after their naming in 2019, showing
occasional daily pageview spikes over 20. NASA has individual "In Depth" pages for all of the 2003 moons (all moons discovered afterward are just informational cards), so it would be a reasonable standard to follow them.
Nrco0e (
talk)
04:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.