The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak delete. Appears to have some internet presence, but no mention in media. Google is useless to verify notability due to term's wide use.
Fagstein17:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)reply
except the third google hit is for
tabs, meaning people care enough about this band to figure out how to play their songs and post it online . . . which is keepworthy, imo.
Strong keep, as a band influential in some circles, with an album and touring as per
WP:MUSIC. If
tabs are one of the first few hits on google, people definitely are/were paying attention to this band. --
He:
ah?23:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Extremely weak keep, weak as a very weak kitten with serious kitten-flu. Niche but not the place to start a mass eviction of bands. Don't rate the fancruft "tabs", they're just lyrics with single-letter chords thrown in.
Deizio00:28, 8 April 2006 (UTC)reply
STRONG KEEP Very notable band, influential and inspiring. It's important to have as much information accesible as possible, especially for bands like this.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.