The result was no consensus. Actually, there is a consensus to merge/redirect but there is no consensus for a target. That issue can be discussed on the article's talk page or someone can be bold and just do it. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC) reply
This article is a content fork from Kama#Theosophy: kama, kamarupa and kamaloka and does not justify a article for this very specific terminology from Theosophy. There are no sources here that need to be merged into the main article so the page should be deleted as an unnecessary split. Wikipedia will not benefit from having every concept, phrase or theosophy neologism defined as separate articles. I note that the text itself appears to be a copyvio of text from http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/etgloss/ea-el.htm which has all rights reserved. Ash ( talk) 13:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC) reply