From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:21, 1 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Edward C. Athey (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. He apparently passed in 2004 from my WP:BEFORE search, so any BLP issues will need to be resolved if kept, but I couldn't find any substantial coverage. SportingFlyer talk 05:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 14:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 14:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete being a mayor is not default sign of notability, not enough sources to show he is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 22:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Cumberland MD is not large enough to hand its mayors an automatic presumption of notability just for existing, but the article isn't sourced well enough to get him over WP:NPOL #2 as the subject of more than just routine local coverage — one reference to the local newspaper, a thing which every mayor of everywhere could always show without fail, is not enough by itself to make a mayor notable. Bearcat ( talk) 19:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.