The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Sam Walton ( talk) 12:09, 8 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Ed Salvato

Ed Salvato (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. WP:BLP of a website editor, referenced only to deadlinked primary sources (his own staff profile on the website of his own employer, the program for a conference at which he spoke) that cannot carry notability, with no evidence of reliable source coverage about him shown at all. As always, a person like this is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists; RS coverage supporting a proper claim of notability must be present for an article to become earned. Bearcat ( talk) 03:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

• Delete Being a regular columnist is not alone enough to establish notability. No coverage to establish he is notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 17:47, 23 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 09:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.