- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- Economic Development Coalition of Southwest Indiana ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable relatively small local organization . The references, according, come from only that region, and thus do not show notability. Furthermore, most of them are mere notices. DGG ( talk ) 22:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as nothing suggesting solid independent notability and also the necessary improvements, still questionable overall. SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Deleete per nom. CerealKillerYum ( talk) 01:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete As much of the coverage appears to be local and routine, and the notability of the organization is questionable. Omni Flames let's talk about it 10:19, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.