The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The page contains no encyclopedic content and is uninformative, with no clear potential for improvement. A complete rewrite may be possible if sufficient information and sources could be obtained.
MopSeeker (
talk)
04:35, 13 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Software comparison pages are relatively common on wikipedia (Category:Software comparisons has over 150 articles). When all of the software compared have individual pages/ are independently notable, as is the case here, such comparisons can be useful and encyclopedic.
Dialectric (
talk)
19:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)reply
If the page is to be kept, then it may be best to move it to a name that indicates its nature as a comparison, and add more software to the comparison. The original page title may then be used for an article describing the type of software.
MopSeeker (
talk)
05:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.