The result was no consensus. If someone wants to renominate this article in good faith with a rationale based on our inclusion guidelines then be my guest. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 23:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply
Nomination on behalf of User:Daysheads57, who intended to bring it here but prodded it instead. Concern is: "Company is not relevant to an encyclopedia." I declined the speedy yesterday and contested this prod as well (also added sources), but I don't want to exploit my knowledge of WP policies to prove my point. I therefore remain neutral. Pgallert ( talk) 09:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC) reply
— Daysheads57 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— Luckylou222 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.