The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC) reply

E.Digital Corporation

E.Digital Corporation (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is sourced to company website and SEC filings. Sure the company exists, but there is no evidence that it passes WP:NCORP notability guidelines. Rusf10 ( talk) 20:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 20:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 20:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 20:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 ( talk) 20:12, 26 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.