- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. clear hoax StarM 15:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dyrakus ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A rather wonderful hoax that sneaked through AFC just over an hour ago. The account in the article is entirely fanciful, the genus is untraceable in a Google search, the offline refs I’ve checked all seem bogus, and the image, taken from Commons, is nothing like what is described in the text. All evidence of this genus was first lost, then destroyed in a fire. Full marks for effort and inventiveness to the creator. Mccapra ( talk) 07:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 07:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 07:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 07:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete -- where to begin? Never was a California warlord named Sabaqe. Rest is equally fanciful. Pity, as it's good writing. Wish it could be preserved somewhere for amusement of posterity. Hyperbolick ( talk) 07:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete and WP:TROUT the person who let it through AFC. Elliot321 ( talk | contribs) 07:30, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I didn't know that was a hoax and let this thing through AfC. It was a mistake. Mario Jump 83! 10:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete and archive it somewhere - it should be preserved somewhere for amusement of posterity! --
Whiteguru (
talk)
10:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hear hear. Lot more work went into this than many efforts at real topics. Hyperbolick ( talk) 11:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - a very elaborate hoax Spiderone 11:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe we should check other dinosaur articles created by 82.41.151.124 (as well as 77.99.156.192). There are quite a few. Editor also created the now deleted Draft:Riley with poop on his head so their contributions are not all scholarly. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.