The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
KeepOppose. There's no reason to coalesce three already-extant and separate articles of different festivals (from Chinese, Korean, Japanese cultures) into one article, and certainly not to appease wikidata (since other language wikipedia didn't clean up their articles and just heap it together). Also, it is clear that "Double Seventh Festival" refers primary to the Chinese variant
[1] from the Googlebooks results, so a hatnote and dab page is suited. --
Cold Season (
talk)
21:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Is there some set and static "multiple choice criteria" that I have to meet? No. And it's a good thing that I didn't strictly vote with no comment. I think you have enough common sense to grasp what's meant, but I will change it to appease you. --
Cold Season (
talk)
14:33, 9 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Keep - I prefer the original state with the disambiguation page (the page requested to be deleted here) instead of the new overlaying article. The relation between the articles is clarified in the articles themselves. The overlaying article did not add any information. I see no reason why we need this seperate article. Wikidata links are not a good enough reason on its own to change content. --
Taketa (
talk)
07:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.