![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2019 March 21. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:32, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Biography, not sourced well enough to clear the notability bar, of a person notable only as mayor of a small village which has long since been annexed as a city neighbourhood. This basically dispatches her work in politics (i.e. the stuff that's relevant to whether she's notable enough for an article or not) with simple statements that she held political roles, while saying literally nothing about any significant or noteworthy accomplishments in those roles, and instead concentrates much more strongly on purely biographical details that have no bearing on her notability either way -- and it's referenced to just two pieces of local media coverage: one obituary, and one article about her initial election as mayor. But that's not enough coverage to make a smalltown mayor special, because every mayor of anywhere can always show at least as much coverage as that. And being the first woman to hold an otherwise non-notable role is not a notability freebie that automatically makes her special, either -- if this had made her the first woman to get elected as a mayor anywhere in Canada, then that would mean something, but she was neither the first in Canada (see Barbara Hanley) nor even the first in Ontario (see Barbara Hanley again, and then take a side trip through Marjorie Hamilton and Charlotte Whitton before coming back here...and that's just who I know about), but merely (tied for) the first in her own county. That's not significant enough to make a woman mayor a special notability case on the basis of being a woman, but the sourcing here isn't strong enough to make her notable on the basis of being a mayor either. Bearcat ( talk) 19:02, 15 January 2019 (UTC)