The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:05, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The article consists of some poem and an unspecific explanation, with no indication that it was notable, and even if it was, cutting and pasting its text isn't encyclopedic. The supposed author's name gets 4 hits on google, with no indication that it's the same person, it's most likely something made up by the author of this article. - Bobet 11:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC) reply