The result was redirect to Quentin Tarantino#Other potential projects. While there were good arguments on both sides, the article can be rebuilt if the project ever develops Firsfron of Ronchester 04:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC) reply
As per WP:NFF, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should NOT have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The assumption should also not be made that because a film is likely to be a high-profile release it will be immune to setbacks—there is no "sure thing" production. Until the start of principal photography, information on the film might be included in articles about its subject material, if available." Furthermore, the film has not even entered into pre-production yet and (as per WP:CRYSTAL) the only evidence of its existence is a scanned title page that could have originated anywhere. There are insufficient details to warrant an article at this point. I propose that if/when the information is verified to be true at a later date, that it be merged into the Quentin Tarantino article until the film enters into production. TheLastAmigo ( talk) 18:31, 30 April 2011 (UTC) reply