The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:09, 24 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Divine Realm (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorially toned article about a band, with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no evidence of reliable source coverage in real media: virtually all of the "references" here are either their own self-published web presence on YouTube or music stores, or WP:BLOGS that cannot support notability at all -- and the only reference in the entire bunch that has any potential to be considered a reliable publication only gives them a mere blurb rather than substantive coverage. Nothing here, either in the substance or the sourcing, is good enough to consider them notable. Bearcat ( talk) 15:05, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby miss fortune} 15:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby miss fortune} 15:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ^{Baby miss fortune} 15:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.