The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC) reply
I was rather startled to find this article had been accepted at AfC, because of the 3 references, 2 are from the company;s web site, and the 3rd is not about the game; and some of the article is even written in the 2nd person. But then I saw that the person who accepted it was the same editor who wrote it. I would have speedied as promotional and A7-web except that I wanted to call attention to this obvious gap in our procedures. (Of course, the result is no worse than writing directly in mainspace, but moves from AfC to mainspace are not easy to identify.) DGG ( talk ) 02:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Although the article appears to be complete on the basis that it contains all of the "necessary" information that one expects in an article about a game, there are issues. First, there is a lack of third party sources, making the majority of the content unverifiable. Second, the majority of the language is subjective and much like that of an advertisement. Third, the language used in the article breaks down several times and is difficult to understand.
rep- oh i didn't see carefully this comment. wtf advertisement content did u see?? Arghya Roy ( talk) 14:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Don't know what's the rush for deletion.I accepted the article for-
source 1- From gamepress, the article is not by the game company or not any personal entry. Gamepress is a non-commercial network for news about games around the world.There were no third party comments. source 2- Netmarble, a subsidiary of CJ Corporation is a is a Korean developer, publisher, and sponsor of free online games. They made this game and released it at September '12 but most of us didn't know there is another korean site by Netmarble and players there are from Korea with more high levels than world.Even their contents are larger than the games official website. had a little confusion about this source. source 3- This is not directly about the game but indirectly about the game. The security system by which the game is protected.This is to express the game's good security system.How this new game is better than other famous fps games like CS,combat force from the sight of security.
"don't know how many reliable sources do u want?why don't u tell the minimum number of sources needed to create an article in the Wikipedia:Reliable sources?r u telling me to create sources:(.if there are no other reliable sources about the game then what to do?tried my best,collected and changed non/reliable sources,searched whole google, asked for help in the talk page to find some reliable sources for the article."
(*read Minor edited article)
Arghya Roy ( talk) 12:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Rep- I knew press released are reliable sources-
Scholarship
Shortcut: WP:SCHOLARSHIP
Articles should rely on secondary sources whenever possible. For example, a review article, monograph, or textbook is better than a primary research paper. When relying on primary sources, extreme caution is advised: Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves. See Wikipedia:No original research. Material such as an article, book, monograph, or research paper that has been vetted by the scholarly community is regarded as reliable. If the material has been published in reputable peer-reviewed sources or by well-regarded academic presses, generally it has been vetted by one or more other scholars. Arghya Roy ( talk) 15:07, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
If my given references are and were not good then how the sources given in the wp game articles Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, Counter-Strike: Condition Zero would capable to fulfill your criteria?with some bad and dead links yes I found a dead link in the article Counter-Strike: Condition Zero, 4 wikipedia links as references in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.I gave a press release which is my current ref 1 is a press release and a ref(no. 2) in the article Counter-Strike: Condition Zero are taken from same place, mine was press release with no 3rd party comments and their is a type of same with a lot of comments, mine is not accepted but that's totally ok.:confused: Arghya Roy ( talk) 17:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC) reply
All links I have found on the web, pls check these-
1. http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/district-187-sin-streets 2. http://massively.joystiq.com/2012/08/27/gamescom-2012-district-187-hounds-and-monarch/ 3. http://my.mmosite.com/3181232/blog/ritem/district_187_sin_streets_ammunitions_thoughts_on_the_core_gameplay.html 4. http://www.gamerevolution.com/preview/district-187-sin-streets 5. http://www.gaminglives.com/2012/09/11/cj-games-globals-mmo-future/ 6. http://mmohuts.com/review/district-187 7. http://www.destructoid.com/district-187-sin-streets-now-available-on-steam-239460.phtml 8. http://www.gamesradar.com/district-187-sin-streets-preview-free-play-gang-warfare/ 9. http://www.gamesradar.com/district-187-sin-streets-preview-free-play-gang-warfare/ 10. http://www.gamershell.com/companies/cj_internet/1049243.html 11. http://www.zam.com/story.html?story=31136 12. http://www.mmoreviews.com/district-187-sin-streets-is-now-live/ 13. http://www.allthatsepic.com/Game_Reviews-detail/district-187-sin-streets-review/ 14. http://www.gamegrin.com/game/preview/district-187-sin-streets-gamescom-2012-preview 15. http://www.gamershell.com/companies/cj_internet/1018394.html 16. http://d187.mmosite.com/news/11202012/district_187_sin_streets_launches_with_massive_content_update_unveiling_new_maps_and_game_mdes.shtml
I have changed all the refs in the article.Tell me what can I do more? If everything fulfill your criteria then how to stop deletion? Will I have to resubmit it? Arghya Roy ( talk) 10:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Rep-
I don't know why did u make the article too short,what's wrong with that?why the hacking section was deleted?it's about the security system of the game.my straight opinion is i don't like it.I need answer.You guys had problems with my sources, why did u do these major changes without confirming me?why u edited the picture section, where is the requirements?I want my own written article back.
Another thing that the game i'm going to tell u that i'm playing the game from september '12, so i took it but the game's official release date is 20th Nov '12 , not 27th. Arghya Roy ( talk) 01:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC) reply
Keep for well sourced, well written, well designed page. Need to expand introduction section. ANIMAXWATER ( talk) 13:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC) — ANIMAXWATER ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply