The result was no consensus. I considered relisting, but the community seems evenly split on this, and I do not think more time is going to produce a consensus one way or the other. JohnCD ( talk) 17:29, 3 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Not really notable on its own. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass ( talk • contribs) 18:36, 25 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Comment: FYI: There was foul play during this process by IP user 68.231.15.56 who made three edits and turned the nominator's comment into a vote. Nominators cannot vote. The diffs are [1] [2] [3] Crtew ( talk) 20:35, 26 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Comment Wkipedia is not benefited one bit by the deletion of every article that one or a dozen people find unnotable. We can all find articles of Wikipedia about people we don't know, stuff we don't care about, or things we think are not notable or even things we perceive to be incredibly obvious. The point is that some find this article subject notable, it is well sourced, and got worldwide coverage, and these points are enough to justify keeping it Legacypac ( talk) 17:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC) reply
my current count is 14 vs 14-- 68.231.15.56 ( talk) 03:25, 30 April 2013 (UTC) reply