The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I realise that this thing has citations but we're not a missing persons database and, really, there doesn't seem to be any substance to this article beyond routine reports. There is nothing to verify inclusion in
Category:Crime in New Jersey. Does it really meet the spirit of
WP:GNG ?
Sitush (
talk)
15:20, 23 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - Unfortunately,
Sitush I think you are going to have a major clean-up on your hands. The editor who created this page has also written a series of articles which, in my opinion, falls under
WP:NOTNEWS. Missing persons cases are interesting subjects for the media to cover; some established a historical significance while others, like this one, are routine in nature. Nothing about this strikes me as
WP:DIVERSE or of
long-term importance to the encyclopedia.
TheGracefulSlick (
talk)
22:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete Does not seem to pass GNG and NCRIME - sourcing in article doesn't establish notability. Note that editor opinion on importance is not relevant - but coverage - which in this case does not seem to exist. Willing to change my vote if someone finds a large collection of 1980s newspaper sources - which I haven't been able to find in a BEFORE.
Icewhiz (
talk)
07:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.