The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DeleteNaconkantari 02:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply
weak delete I've heard of it, but see Terence Ong's comments above.
M1ss1ontomars2k4(
T |
C |
@) 18:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Transwiki parts to wiktionary. There are sources for usage of this term, see
[1],
[2] (third paragraph, second section,)
[3] (ninth paragraph) and
[4], among others. I think it is a valid dicdef but probably not a full article.
Grandmasterka 01:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 01:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Keep - i've added some examples in use...but this is getting out of hand - i can't verify all this American stuff, but i'm working on it. Poss transwiki.
Pydos 09:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)reply
Delete - per nom.
Zaxem 01:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.