The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article subject fails to meet
WP:GNG. The only source of which I can find about him on Google was about him being sacked as an advisor. Nothing else more than that. Also the creator of the article seems to be a newbie which I guess hasn't practiced about the
wikipedia article wizard before contributing to wikipedia. You can also
visit here for further reference. Most of the reference used on this particular article headline are not corresponding to the original source. Maybe he had to fake it to make it look like its an independent reliable source.Gabriel(talk to me )18:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
All the link you have provided still doesn't address why he was nominated for an AFD. The only reasonable news was that he was sacked. The rest of the news has nothing to do with him apart from him being sacked. Editors should take note that the article creator was the same person who voted this keep.--Gabriel(talk to me )21:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete The sources (including the above) only briefly mention him so lack of significant coverage and he barely passes
WP:POLITICIAN. The
Afgan bios source is better so if there are more like this I might change my mind. The article will need a rewrite though as it is a mess. — Iadmc♫talk 21:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
They are in Persian and I can't translate them. Not that the language of the source is important only the reliablity and coverage given to the subject. These blogs are not considered reliable per
WP:blog — Iadmc♫talk 20:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete or Draftify I am open to draftify, but article is a mess. Needs a proper re-write and submittion if kept. The tone is very bias. As per
WP:POLITICIAN: Subject must have "received significant press coverage". Sourcing seems to only briefly mention him, appears to lack significant coverage.
Lekkha Moun (
talk)
16:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Dear @
Lekkha Moun Please allow me to prove it to you. In this section, there are dozens of reliable references available. There are various news articles as well. Please pay attention to the news section. All these references are trustworthy according to Wikipedia. In the biography section, detailed information is available on the Afghan Bios website, which is specifically dedicated to politicians and important figures of Afghanistan. So, what is the issue?
Parwiz ahmadi (
talk)
19:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I'm not convinced a draft would be any better: they would see all the same issues and reject it over and over. @
Parwiz ahmadi the issue is the lack of significant [i.e. a large amount of and important] press coverage. Cheers — Iadmc♫talk 20:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.