- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 ( talk) 03:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Detention (2003 film)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Detention (2003 film) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails WP:NFO, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:SIGCOV. Found only one review on Rotten Tomatoes. Needs two or more reviews in order to be eligible. The Film Creator ( talk) 01:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator ( talk) 01:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: There is a TV Guide review and a Video Business review. Somebodyidkfkdt ( talk) 01:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Would keep but that plot looks copied from a box. Hyperbolick ( talk) 06:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, review at RT (as mentioned by nominator) and a second at TV Guide (as mentioned by Somebodyodkfkdt). Plot is almost 100% copied from IMdB, and needs to be rewritten. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:15, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- I withdraw nomination per consensus and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator ( talk) 19:33, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.