Wikipedia:articles For Deletion Destiny Herndon-de La Rosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 19:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Wave Feminists, I'd suggest either deleting this outright, or redirecting to 2017 Women's March#Partnership controversies. Herndon-de la Rosa is the founder of the organization, which was not considered notable at AFD despite a brief news blip when the Women's March received some flak for partnering with them, and doesn't seem to have meaningful additional notability of her own. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 16:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 17:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 17:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 17:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Kpg jhp jm 17:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks Roscelese for bring this up. I think she obviously meets the criteria for notability: – She receive significant coverage in 2017 and 2018 in multiple published secondary sources, including leading American publications (e.g., the NYT, the Atlantic) – In most cases, this coverage is dedicated to covering issues related to her decisions and beliefs; she is not a trivial component of the articles – Her notability is not confined to a single event; she is now considered one of the most important leaders within the American pro-life movement, on a par with Abby Johnson, for example; her beliefs and comments are frequently tied to current events – Additional criteria that she satisfies are as an "opinion maker" with a significant following Revfulop1994 ( talk) 20:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Keep Two articles in the Washington Post this year, and an interview in NPR found for a 3 minute search. Has coverage, passed WP:BIO. scope_creep ( talk) 12:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:33, 2 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 2 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:03, 9 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Keep Significant coverage in reliable sources sufficient to meet WP:GNG. PohranicniStraze ( talk) 03:38, 9 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.