The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Dawn Fantasia (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable Politician who fails WP:NPOL Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 05:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 06:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 06:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 06:01, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep WP:NPOL? I see plenty of articles about her in the Internet. It seems like she received major press attention.Also the presence of this article will help to counter WP:Systemic bias Sincerely, Masum Reza ^☎ 08:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Politicians at the county level of office are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, or even because they get the purely local media coverage that every county politician always gets because covering local politics is local media's job — to clear the notability bar for her own article, she would need to be able to show nationalizing coverage that expands well beyond what's simply expected for a county freeholder to be able to show. And as important as it is to counter systemic bias, we do not do that by creating special lowered notability standards whereby members of equity groups get into Wikipedia just for being county or city councillors while only straight white men actually have to clear a conventional notability standard — we do it by working to identify the women or people of colour or LGBTs who do clear our existing notability standards but are getting overlooked. Bearcat ( talk) 15:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete Fails NPOL as well as WP:GNG. Totally non-notable subject. Skirts⁸⁹ 16:39, 27 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete Fails NPOL as well as WP:GNG - nothing notable here. Lubbad85 ( ☎) 19:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete Local politicians do not get auto-notability, they require significant coverage in sources outside of the local area.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 01:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Just a typical local politician, with typical local coverage. Newshunter12 ( talk) 05:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.