The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Regardless of his notability as a politician, I would say the subject passes GNG. The LA Times, Seattle Times, and Yahoo Finance seem more than 'standard local news coverage'.
Gilded Snail (
talk)
21:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. The "standard local news coverage" test applies to mayors and city councillors and other officeholders at the local level of political office, but that's not the level of significance in play here. This subject held a seat in a state legislature, which is an
WP:NPOL #1 pass right on its face — at that level of office, we don't have any conditions as to how local or non-local the sources need to be, because the office is an inherently notable one at the state level of government. As long as we can properly verify that the person actually held the claimed role and isn't an outright hoax, state legislators are guaranteed Wikipedia articles — when it comes to politicians, the question of how non-local their sourcing needs to be only comes into play at the county and city council levels, and is not relevant to state legislators or congresspeople at all.
Bearcat (
talk)
22:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.