From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 18:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC) reply

David Drábek (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ENT and WP:DIRECTOR. Results on Google are social media/affiliated sources. Only cited source in article is from the Czech Wikipedia, which of course, is unreliable.

1. No evidence of multiple notable roles, a cult following, or unique, prolific, or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment ( WP:ENT)

2. No evidence of regard as an important figure or wide acceptance by peers or successors, nor is there evidence of him creating a notable new concept, theory, or technique. He has played no major role in a well-known work covered independently, none of his works have won significant critical reception. ( WP:DIRECTOR) Mr. Guye ( talk) 02:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 03:01, 4 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk to me 03:01, 4 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:51, 4 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, a notable personality in the context of the Czech theatre, has won awards such as Alfréd Radok Award, which is a very important recognition. I'm trying to improve the article but I'm busy at the moment so my work here is slow and irregular. -- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 07:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  05:20, 11 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, meets WP:DIRECTOR 4c) "The person's work (or works) either…has won significant critical attention" through his multiple awards, now mentioned in the article and supported by a reliable source. C 679 06:17, 12 December 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as per above. Won major awards, source exists for verification. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 14:14, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.