The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
no evidence of meeting WP:PROF -- he's an entrepreneur, not an academic. Promotional for his non-notable activities in that sphere. References are press releases, self-serving interviews, and , mostly, notices. Written by now blocked undeclared paid editor.,tho they had not yet been detected when the article was written--and it's time we made the speedy criterion for that retroactive. DGG (
talk )
06:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete a paper written as a fellow is not enough to show major impact to pass academic notability one, and nothing else even comes remotely close to showing notability.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
05:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.