The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Daud Arsala (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I mistakenly PRODed this not realising it was ineligible. This man was an unsuccessful candidate in a parliamentary election. I’ve looked in English and found only a couple of passing mentions in directories. In Pashto I found nothing at all. Therefore it’s clear the man is not notable. Mccapra ( talk) 04:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 04:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Mccapra ( talk) 04:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC) reply

• Delete. Seems to fail WP:NBIO. -- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Being an unsuccessful candidate for political office is not an inclusion-clinching notability claim, but this doesn't even really try to make a claim that he had preexisting notability for other reasons that would have gotten him into Wikipedia independently of the candidacy — the only reference being cited here at all is a glancing namecheck of his existence as a giver of soundbite in an article about somebody else, not coverage about him for the purposes of establishing his notability. I'd also note that the original prod was removed on the grounds that the prod rationale was expressed in a nonsensical and invalid way, not because there was any actual debate about his lack of notability — but since we're here, we're here. Also, both of the images in the article are screenshotted from a website but falsely claimed as Creative Commons-licensed original work created by the uploader, and accordingly have also had to be nominated for deletion at FFD. Bearcat ( talk) 17:39, 11 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete - fails WP:NBIO - MA Javadi ( talk) 16:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply
• Delete failed candidates for public office are almost never notable for such. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 06:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.