From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 02:25, 25 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Darklady (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability for WP:NPOL as an unelected candidate; fails notability for WP:AUTHOR for non-notable writing; remove all of the non-sourced BLP info and she fails WP:GNG. – S. Rich ( talk) 20:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:55, 18 July 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:56, 18 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Article relies exclusively on primary and unreliable sources for referencing. Being an unelected candidate for office does not get her past WP:POLITICIAN — and the article as written does not actually demonstrate or source any substantive reason why she would pass WP:WRITER either. Delete; no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can actually come up with real sourcing about her career as a writer. Bearcat ( talk) 03:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete This person fails the notability guidelines for politicians by a very large margin. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.