- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 16:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Dario Celaschi ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a person whose notability derives entirely from positions in student government and from a general election they didn't win, with no properly sourced indication that they would pass WP:NPOL in an encyclopedia with a general audience. Sourcing is almost entirely to primary sources, so they don't get past WP:GNG either. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 23:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:20, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable. Student politics doesn't count and hasn't shown any significance in term of national politics. Cowlibob ( talk) 14:22, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, agree with the arguments of the nominator.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.