- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Darbhanga Aviations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It existed, but can't establish that it meets
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG. It has been tagged for notability for more than 8 years, hopefully we can now get it resolved.
Boleyn (
talk)
17:56, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 18:55, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep-Subject is a airline that was defunct in 1962 and still it manages to get coverage in recent years 1, 2, 3. That itself clears any doubt on its notability. Also given that it is a Indian airline of 1950s-60s and based in a small town, older sources will not be available despite the subject being notable (see WP:INDAFD). Google books search link also provides many answers. Pratyush ( talk) 12:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep if it existed and operated commercial flights then it is notable the fact the article is wrongly named (should be Darbhanga Aviation and needs a serious re-write shouldnt be a reason to delete it. MilborneOne ( talk) 12:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- Withdraw nomination convinced by helpful comments above. Best wishes, Boleyn ( talk) 13:53, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.