- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Danny Page ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Candidate for U.S. Senate who has not received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. The few independent sources that do cover the subject do not cover him in-depth or outside of the context of a single event (the 2014 election). Hirolovesswords ( talk) 23:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
It is correct that the candidate has not received significant coverage in "reliable, independent sources". However, he has been discussed in the Tennessean and the Chattanooga Times Free Press, both of which are statewide-circulated newspapers, and both of which were cited on the page. His media coverage is similar to that of candidate George Flinn who was deemed to have enough credible sources to justify a Wikipedia article. It also contains more information and cites more sources than that of State Representative Susan Lynn. Composedinsantiy ( talk) 18:44, 11 September 2014 (CDT)
- Note - Another Danny Page article was previously deleted, however, that article was about a different subject. -- Hirolovesswords ( talk) 23:27, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Flinn's article isn't relevant to whether or not this one should be deleted. However, Flinn has served as a County Commissioner and Lynn is a State Representative. Page has never held office and has not received substantial coverage of his campaign for the Senate from reliable sources. Thus he fails WP:POLITICIAN. Tiller54 ( talk) 13:43, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Subject does not meet criteria for notability. ALPolitico ( talk) 00:01, 16 September 2014
- Delete per WP:POLITICIAN, candidates for office are covered in the articles about the campaign. And as Mr. Page is not otherwise notable, as evidenced by the lack of coverage about him from independent reliable sources, there is no need for an freestanding article.-- danntm T C 05:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- ""Delete"" Page does not qualify per WP:POLITICIAN nor does he seem to have any other merits for judgement. Any information which is relevant to the election should be moved to the appropriate page. ( Downix ( talk) 06:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC))
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.