The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep passes
WP:POLITICIAN, "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage. Generally speaking, mayors are likely to meet this criterion." Quit a bit of coverage in a couple of local news sites as can be seen with this
Search.—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Wintonian (
talk •
contribs) 23:12, June 1, 2010
Delete, this is all local news coverage. If we had something substantial from The Philadelphia Inquirer, that would be different; however, typical smalltown news coverage isn't enough, or otherwise all mayors would be notable.
Nyttend (
talk) 05:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete Unnotable local figure - if the only coverage is local, that isn't significant press coverage for meeting
WP:POLITICIAN,
WP:BIO in general, nor
WP:N. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs) 05:28, 2 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete the only press coverage seems to be the type of routine coverage in the local newspaper which all local politicos get.
Valenciano (
talk) 07:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)reply
Delete: Only local news. It can't even be argued that local news has the possibility of showing notability for a mayor because every single mayor in the whole world has local news.
Joe Chill (
talk) 14:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.