From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 22:17, 18 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Daniel Jackson (activist) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. ... discospinster talk 21:49, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:29, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:29, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:29, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:30, 11 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Keep. Page should be kept. I've seen tons more that are years old with just 1 article reference and the rest being the person's social medias. Doeke is quite known. Thonkingman (talk) 22:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thonkingman ( talkcontribs) creator of the pageeditor blocked for socking. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 21:08, 14 August 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.