From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete I shall close this AfD before time's up. I believe it is not helpful to discuss this for a whole week when we are six days out from an election. I've gone ahead with deleting the article as this action was supported by the article's creator. Schwede 66 07:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Damon Rusden (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NPOLITICIAN as he is purely a candidate. Infobox is misleading, there's no such thing as an incumbent candidate. Doesn't meet general WP:BIO. CelenaSkaggs ( talk) 17:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN and based on list ranking is unlikely to after Sept 23. Ajf773 ( talk) 00:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete, will make better contributions next time. Nexus000 ( talk) 03:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 04:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Merge and redirect this electioneering to the electorate page as a one-liner. Stuartyeates ( talk) 09:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.