From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I as a nominator now agree this should be kept and withdraw this AfD. (non-admin closure) Dial911 ( talk) 17:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Dambaru Sisa (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

More than 70% of the article is copied from erienewsnow.com/story/39526269/the-primitive-tribe-bonda-is-not-meant-only-for-photography-they-deserve-better-life-dambaru-sisa-mla-odisha-state-legislative-assembly-india. After removing copied material, this article would not have reliable sources. Only The Pioneer newspaper has 5 lines mentioned about Sirsa. I don't think that is enough to sustain this. Dial911 ( talk) 06:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:52, 23 November 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:52, 23 November 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: I will improve the article but keep this article and I have added listed below evidence, those are sufficient for WP:NPOL

Bondas, a primitive tribe in Odisha hills, get their first MLA

First Bonda MLA, Odisha Suntimes

First Bonda tribe MLA in Odisha Assembly Press Trust Of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

Bonda Tryst With Democracy, Hindustan Times, Odisha

Why I hope #AchheDin won’t reach Andaman’s primitive Jarawas, Wordly Ties

Odisha MLA helps public repair damaged road, Asian Age, Odisha

Delay in construction of Gurupriya Bridge raise speculations , Dailyhunt, Odisha


User:BibhutiPattnayak 11:49, 23 November 2018 (GMT)

  • Keep: Above evidence are sufficient to keep this article under WP:NPOL category — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyanprakashsingh1990 ( talkcontribs) 12:29, 23 November 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. Yes, this still needs some improvement, but the sources do exist to improve it with. Even if they're weakly sourced in their current state, we know for a fact that holders of office at the state legislative assembly level get reliable source coverage — and passing GNG is a question of how many sources exist to improve the article with, not of how many sources are already in the current version of the article. Copyright problems don't necessarily have to force the deletion of the article in all instances, because articles can be easily rewritten to resolve the copyright problem — and since the copied source is actually a press release on an open press release distribution platform in an American local media market where an Indian MLA would not be expected to organically generate real news coverage, this isn't even really a copyright violation — rather, it was that classic Wikipedia referencing error, where people who misunderstand how our referencing rules work think they can self-publish their own self-written referencing to user-generated platforms as a substitute for organic media coverage. That's obviously not how it works, for anybody — but proper referencing does exist here, and the creator has already taken the note and started showing some of it. So let's chalk this up to good faith newbie error and move on. Bearcat ( talk) 17:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.