- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 09:57, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- D. Kuppuramu ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Losing candidate in election. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk) 07:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk) 07:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib ( talk) 07:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete unelected candidates are not notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 13:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in elections they did not win, but this neither demonstrates preexisting notability for other reasons independently of the candidacy nor sources a credible reason to treat his candidacy as more special than everybody else's candidacies. Bearcat ( talk) 15:44, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a notable person
- Being state president of a political party's internal org chart still is not a reason why he would get an encyclopedia article. He has to hold office in a state or national legislature before he gets to be considered automatically notable — and the only other way he gets an article any earlier than that is by being the subject of a substantial volume of press coverage to get over WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 17:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL. Likely yet another creation from the BJP's promotional editing staff. Best, GPL93 ( talk) 20:26, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and seems to have close connection with the subject as mentioned by GPL93. WP:COI. Abishe ( talk) 14:34, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MILL, WP:NPOL, and WP:CRYSTAL. His promotion to a higher party office is entirely speculative and possibly spam. Bearian ( talk) 19:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It seems like BJP IT guys are tied up creating/maintaining pages who doesn't qualify WP:NPOL. No assertion of Notabililty rather seems a puff. Accesscrawl ( talk) 06:53, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.