The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Closing early per
WP:SNOW with a clear consensus to keep, and also due to the high likelihood of this being a bad faith nomination.
KaisaL (
talk)
00:58, 10 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Largely unsourced, over the top entry, too promotional to save. Cannot find enough sources to assert she is absolutely notable to begin with either.
Baum des Lichtes (
talk)
16:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - The article is written like an advertisement and I am not sure the individual is notable enough for an article. Best,
Mifter (
talk)
01:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: The article is very poor quality and is, indeed, written worse than a bad press release, but the most cursory of google searches brings up multiple independent, third-party sources in addition to what's in the article:
[1],
[2],
[3],
[4],
[5],
[6]. The WP:NEWSBLOG feature by Neiman-Marcus alone establishes notability.
Montanabw(talk)18:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: Poorly written is not a reason for deletion. A minimal amount of work to do
WP:BEFORE would have, as Montanabw pointed out brought up many independent RS, showing that she is indeed a reputable designer and was nominated as a member of the Council of Fashion Designers of America. In addition to those Montanabw found are:
[7],
[8],
[9]SusunW (
talk)
18:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)reply
KeepMontanabw and
SusunW have found several RS that show the subject passes GNG. Again, as they mentioned, we don't delete articles based on the quality of writing. I personally think Wiki is better served fixing problems you find as you find them, but that's my way of editing and not everyone has to do things on Wiki the same way.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk)
21:12, 6 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep there are lots and lots of mentions in web and news sources. They are not the greatest mentions, in that they are quite thin, but this is what fashion reporting is like. The mentions are numerous enough that I have zero problems with keeping an article on her here.
HappyValleyEditor (
talk)
03:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.