The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. I can confirm existance (
here), but that's about it. No sources are apparent for the law firm, either.
UltraExactZZSaid~
Did 13:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep while sourcing does need to be improved, this is not a reason for deletion. He's a member of a US state senate, a first level sub national parliament, therefore meets
WP:POLITICIAN.
Valenciano (
talk) 18:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep. Aren't
state senators, with
articles including them, presumptively notable? See
wp:politician, which states: "A person is generally notable if they meet any of the following standards.... Politicians who have held ... sub-national (statewide...) office, and members and former members of a ... state ... legislature...."--
Epeefleche (
talk) 18:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Speedy keep as a member of a sub-national legislature. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 23:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Yes but can you find any sources which could actually be used to write an article??I can see no indication of significant coverage in independent sources.
Dr. BlofeldWhite cat 16:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I would refer you back to the notability standards. A person is generally notable if they meet the standards that this person without question meets. Full stop. As to your working on the article, that is a different issue, but you might start with the articles to which I referred you above.--
Epeefleche (
talk) 20:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)reply
As Epeefleche says. Maybe you're unaware of it, but
stubs are perfectly acceptable articles. The fact he exists and he's a member of the legislature can be sourced and are perfectly sufficient for an article to exist. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 07:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Keep. In an ideal world, Wikipedia has articles on every legislator in the world for which verifiable sources exist. There are plenty of verifiable records for the Idaho legislature. It will just take an enterprising encyclopedist to go dig them up and use them to write a good article.
ScienceApologist (
talk) 19:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.