The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 19:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete membership in the organization he is part of is not enough to make someone notable.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 01:36, 4 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:OUTCOMES. We have tended to keep Emperors/Empresses in the major Imperial Court systems, which are charitable organizations.
Bearian (
talk) 16:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)reply
I see nothing in outcomes about keeping gimmicky fake titles from local charity balls. If there has been such a precedence it should be stopped due to a lack of
notability.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 07:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sam Walton (
talk) 16:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. No,
WP:OUTCOMES doesn't seem to suggest we keep this and I'm very relieved to find that.
WP:GNG should apply and in this case it doesn't seem to.
Thincat (
talk) 17:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Yeah, this person clearly doesn't have the sort of notability beyond blogs and local media to meet
WP:GNG.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 21:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.