The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 01:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC) reply

Craig Fiegener (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly non-notable individual (fails WP:POLITICIAN). Primary reference appears to be a press release. Primefac ( talk) 13:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete Non-notable local TV journalist. The article calls him a "politician" but that is false; he was just a write-in candidate in one race, and was merely interviewed for an appointive position in the other case. -- MelanieN ( talk) 04:45, 24 November 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete Simply being a candidate does not show notability. Nothing supports notability claims as a journalist, either. There are thousands of local Emmy awards given every year so winning one is not sufficient to show notability. 131.118.229.17 ( talk) 22:04, 25 November 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.