The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Of note is that the link provided by User:Vejvančický provides additional scholarly papers about the topic (with the topic as part of the title of the papers) when viewing additional page results. ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Correlates of crime (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Article topic is simply a common phrase used to describe many aspects of the world related to crime. The full topic itself is only discussed in a single source, with the rest of the sources representing editor synthesis. aprock ( talk) 03:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep, widely discussed topic [1], has room for improvements. -- Vejvančický ( talk / contribs) 07:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC) reply

That Google search only lists three sources which discuss the topic. That doesn't seem very wide. aprock ( talk) 14:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:07, 2 July 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep, most educational and encyclopedic and covered in multiple sources. — Cirt ( talk) 16:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 15:51, 9 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Weak keep - Notable concept within criminology. Needs some better sources and rewritten, but seems worth to keep it. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{ re}} 03:12, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep' - part of a series on Victimology. Bearian ( talk) 16:48, 14 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.