From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Conrad Taylor (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL Local officials do not merit an article unless they have significant coverage. His coverage is strictly local and routine. Rogermx ( talk) 15:47, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  16:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  16:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 04:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 21:24, 30 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Binghamton NY is not a large enough city to confer an automatic presumption of notability on its city councillors per WP:NPOL — only major, internationally famous metropolitan global cities get that privilege — but the sourcing here evinces neither the volume nor the geographic range needed to cross from routine coverage and into notability territory. Every city councillor in every town or city on earth could always show five pieces of local coverage — what we require to deem him notable would be that the coverage showed him to be significantly more notable than the thousands upon thousands upon tens of thousands of other municipal councillors in the world, but nothing here is accomplishing that at all. Bearcat ( talk) 23:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. As per the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan ( talk) 02:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete Binghampton has less than 50,000 people. He is way, way, way below the notability threshold for politicians. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 02:52, 7 July 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.