The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Drmies (
talk) 02:38, 26 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete a local election candidate from outside the main US political parties for a city of 47,000 is always going to struggle to meet
WP:BIO and
WP:POLITICIAN. Lack of coverage means this one misses it by a long way.
Valenciano (
talk) 18:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Unelected candidates for city council don't pass
WP:NPOL on that basis alone — in a city of this size, even winning the city council seat wouldn't be enough (we only grant NPOL to city councillors in major metropolitan
global cities, not in cities of 40K.) So if you cannot make a credible and properly sourced case that he's notable enough for a Wikipedia article for some other reason, then he just doesn't make it in here. Delete.
Bearcat (
talk) 16:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per all of the above; see
WP:SNOW.
Bearian (
talk) 13:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.