From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Rlendog ( talk) 01:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Connor Goggin

Connor Goggin (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 03:46, 10 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Being All-Ivy League Second Team does not count for passing NHOCKEY. Joeykai ( talk) 18:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 15:30, 15 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete contrary to the above to meet criteria #4 you have to have been one of the things listed in it. Thus a first all star team member. Not second. - DJSasso ( talk) 16:02, 15 April 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Beyond DJSasso's and Joeykai's comments, the Ivy League is not a major collegiate league. Some (but not all) of its members compete in ECAC play, but any Ivy League-only "all-star team" is certainly not official. Further, at the collegiate level, being an All-American is the fundamental level of notability, not conference all-star teams. That being said, the subject's modest and brief pro career doesn't meet either the GNG or NHOCKEY either. Ravenswing 16:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:49, 18 April 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.