The result was Keep Although the discussion is hung either way, we need to judge consensus against policy and the policy on wikipedia articles is that the content of articles must be verifiable. In this case this us a super-stub and there is actually not meaningful information to verify. I'm inclined to the view that the subject in inherently notable so I can't see any conclusion except that we should keep this as it stands. Spartaz Humbug! 14:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC) reply
May be notable, but as it stands it fails WP:V and WP:RS. Wizardman 15:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC) reply