The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Just to add, almost every bit of information in this article is not sourced as the vast majority of references are to complexitygaming.com, or to a twitter or facebook post by one of them.
{MordeKyle} ☢23:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)reply
'Keep. One of the premier esports organizations with top-level professional teams across multiple games. A quick Google Search brings up in-depth coverage of the team, its players, storylines, lifestyle from many sources: a
PC Gamer piece on its return to CSGO
[1], an
International Business Times piece on the history of the team and its future goals
[2], a
USA Today piece about the DOTA II teams' trainign regime and lifestyle
[3], an
ESPN story about roster changes
[4] which were also covered by
The Score Esports[5],
GameSpot piece on its Starcraft II activity
[6]. This is without going into articles that cover storyline or results of their matches such as
[7],
[8],
[9],
[10]. The article needs work, but the subject meets
WP:ORG. ----
Patar knight - chat/contributions17:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: This is one of the most prominent North American esports organizations; its notability and availability should not be called into question, by any stretch of the imagination. As for MordeKyle's replies to the keep votes, I would say this is a poorly-constructed article deserving significant work, about a worthy subject. AfD is certainly not the answer.
DARTHBOTTOtalk•
cont00:29, 11 December 2016 (UTC)reply
@
DarthBotto:I'm asking only because I want to learn, what is the answer? The page is full of what is effectively
WP:CRUFT and is nothing more than a very unsourced list of people. Maintenance tags have been ineffective in changing things. I'm genuinely curious.
{MordeKyle} ☢00:32, 11 December 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.